A stepped-care programme of brief psychological interventions for adults affected by adversity in Jordan: Lessons from a pilot randomised controlled trial in Jordan

Dharani Keyan, Rand Habashneh, Hafsa El-Dardery, Muhannad Faroun, Feda’a Al-Johary, Adnan Abualhaija, Ibrahim Said Aqel, Aemal Akhtar, Latefa Dardas, Richard A. Bryant
Output type
Journal article
Location
Jordan
Focus areas
Mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS)
Topics
No items found.
Programme
Humanitarian Research
Organisations
University of New South Wales
Background

Stepped care frameworks comprise of the use of relatively limited resources to serve the greatest number of people.

Objective

We conducted a pilot randomised controlled trial in Jordan between September 2022 and February 2023 to evaluate the feasibility of a stepped care model of psychological care for distressed adults.

Methods

Participants were randomised to receive a stepped care intervention involving a guided self-help program (Doing What Matters; DWM), and if still met criteria for psychological distress, followed by a more intensive group program (group Problem Management Plus; gPM+) or a guided self-help program alone. Both intervention arms also received enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) that comprised referral to available community support services. A mixed methods design was used to assess feasibility and acceptability and expected clinical outcomes.

Findings

One hundred and forty-five distressed adults (meeting Kessler Distress Score-10 score of ≥20) were randomised to either the stepped care or the single intervention arm (86% female) on a 1:1 allocation basis. DWM was delivered over five weeks by trained non-specialist helpers, where participants attended on average 2.6 support calls. Those randomised to gPM+ attended on average 3.3 sessions. The study demonstrated feasibility and acceptability for DWM and gPM+ interventions as delivered by trained non-specialists. Although the trial was not powered to detect clinical effectiveness, the stepped care arm relative to the single intervention arm demonstrated significantly lower depression symptoms immediately after and at 3-months following intervention delivery.

Conclusions

The study and trial procedures were acceptable to participants, non-specialists, and programme staff and demonstrated feasibility of implementing such a framework in Jordan.

Clinical implications

These findings informed a fully powered definitive RCT seeking to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a stepped model of care in Jordan.

This publication relates to R2HC funded study: Caring for carers: A psychosocial supervision intervention for mental health practitioners

Other resources

explore all resources
Minds Under Siege: Cognitive Signatures of Poverty and Trauma in Refugee and Non‐Refugee Adolescents
Evidence brief: The magnitude and severity of abortion related complications in Bangui, CAR
The Reliability and Feasibility of the HESPER Web to Assess Perceived Needs in a Population Affected by a Humanitarian Emergency
Mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS)
No items found.
Middle East
Jordan
University of New South Wales