Shaping the future: Our strategy for research and innovation in humanitarian response.
Considering the global burden of NCDs, this review found a dearth of evidence on interventions against the most prevalent NCDs of cardiovascular/pulmonary disease and cancer. Additionally, nearly all of these studies were conducted in the Middle East. This could be due to prolific disease-specific groups concentrated in these areas, but geographic over-representation is a lesser concern than the absence of evidence on the majority of NCDs in these settings and populations. Thus, high quality studies are required on NCD interventions in humanitarian crises settings in order to be able to demonstrate a significant improvement in health outcomes as a result of the delivery of NCD interventions in complex emergency settings. However, there is substantial evidence on the effectiveness of NCD interventions in stable and development contexts as argued by Ebrahim et al. (2013) with numerous review available in the literature (e.g. Araujo et al. 2007, Djulbegovic et al., 2010, Saquibe et al., 2013).
You are seeing this because you are using a browser that is not supported. The Elrha website is built using modern technology and standards. We recommend upgrading your browser with one of the following to properly view our website:
Windows MacPlease note that this is not an exhaustive list of browsers. We also do not intend to recommend a particular manufacturer's browser over another's; only to suggest upgrading to a browser version that is compliant with current standards to give you the best and most secure browsing experience.