See the latest information and resources from Elrha in relation to coronavirus (Covid-19)

We are Elrha, a force for change in the humanitarian community. The research and innovation we support equips the humanitarian community with the knowledge of what works, so people affected by crises get the right help when they need it most.
Our purpose is clear: to empower the humanitarian community to improve humanitarian response. We make this happen by supporting and championing the outcomes of robust research and proven innovations.
We empower the humanitarian community. Find out how we can support you...

4 Results for Health Topics

4.1 Communicable disease control

4.1.7 Recommendations for future research

Disease-specific gaps

• Specific evidence gaps exist around many communicable diseases such as pertussis, hepatitis A and E, or measles.
• Further review of the literature has highlighted that there is a particular need for research on interventions against
NTDs (especially those with elimination targets for 2020) and polio in these settings.
• Malaria has been extensively studied in these settings, but due to the fact that existing research is largely
polarised this sector could focus on gathering more evidence for a given context on those areas in which there is
currently little evidence for a particular setting/population (e.g. more vector control studies from Southeast Asia)

Indicators, standards, and guidelines

• The CD sector has felt a lack of uniform agreement in the area of using protocols to direct interventions, and
indicators to measure their impact; research should be conducted on how to best standardise both of these for
the CD community in crisis settings.
• The evidence base for CD interventions in crisis settings needs to be strengthened, starting with development of
protocols and indicators on which everyone has consensus, e.g. Sphere indicators must be reframed into
something context-specific.
• Better standard measurements are needed for mortality (e.g. age and gender specific) data.
Study design
• Research could help validate syndromic diagnoses versus laboratory confirmed outcomes for the majority of CD
interventions (e.g., diarrhoeal and non-malarial vector borne diseases).
• New measurement methods should be considered, e.g. for assessing immunization coverage.
• More anthropological/sociological research is needed for CD intervention success (e.g. acceptability, accessibility).
Contextual factors
•Increasing urbanisation and movement to coastal areas means that more attention should be given to CD research
in humanitarian contexts in these settings, including disease movement to and from these population areas.

View Publication View Executive Summary View Executive Summary - French

Subscribe to our newsletters....

Elrha © 2018 - 2020 Elrha is a registered charity in England and Wales (1177110). KEEP IN TOUCH Want to stay up to date with our latest updates? Sign up to our newsletters
Elrha Please upgrade your browser

You are seeing this because you are using a browser that is not supported. The Elrha website is built using modern technology and standards. We recommend upgrading your browser with one of the following to properly view our website:

Windows Mac

Please note that this is not an exhaustive list of browsers. We also do not intend to recommend a particular manufacturer's browser over another's; only to suggest upgrading to a browser version that is compliant with current standards to give you the best and most secure browsing experience.