We are Elrha, a force for change in the humanitarian community. The research and innovation we support equips the humanitarian community with the knowledge of what works, so people affected by crises get the right help when they need it most.
Our purpose is clear: to empower the humanitarian community to improve humanitarian response. We make this happen by supporting and championing the outcomes of robust research and proven innovations.
We empower the humanitarian community. Find out how we can support you...

Principal Investigator: Claire Horwell, Durham University

Purpose

Volcanic ash inhalation can trigger respiratory illness and cause acute anxiety, leading to increased vulnerability during eruptions. Agencies distribute facemasks which, likely, have poor facial seals and inadequately filter fine-grained particles. High-efficiency masks, though, may underperform if not fit-tested, are costly and uncomfortable.

The study aimed to investigate respiratory protection (facemasks) used in volcanic eruptions. Through a clinical trial and laboratory experiments, the research team sought to establish whether some forms of protection were better than others, and if some protection is better than no protection. The research also aimed to explore behavioural factors influencing mask use in different societies, and help inform how advice about protection should be modified for different cultures, climates and economies.

Play video

Outcomes

The study successfully completed laboratory testing of a number of facemasks, and undertook wearability trials of masks amongst communities affected by volcanic ash. Social surveys were completed in three country settings – Indonesia, Mexico and Japan – alongside anthropological research to explore behavioural factors and how to tailor effective messages around protection. A wide range of communication products and guidance on the use of facemasks has been produced and disseminated, and train-the-trainer courses have been delivered and tested in Indonesia.

The study had intended to undertake a clinical trial in Japan to test the respiratory outcomes of wearing different facemasks, amongst patients with asthma living close to an active volcano. The trail was not able to be undertaken, but the study team instead designed two epidemiology protocols for rapid deployment in future eruptions and a clinical protocol for laboratory-based work to test the health benefits of wearing masks when exposed to ash.

Play video

Key Findings:

  • Laboratory experiments demonstrated that some forms of respiratory protection are more effective against volcanic ash than others.
  • Whilst all types of respiratory protection studied provided some level of protection, this varied greatly depending on the material.
  • The social research found that contextual factors influence the motivation to use respiratory protection during eruptions and these should be taken into account when agencies and governments develop communication strategies to promote mask use and other protective actions.
Play video

Key outputs:

  • 4 peer reviewed articles have been published, and a further 13 are planned
  • New epidemiology protocols published on the IVHHN and HIVE websites
  • New guidelines on facemask use: www.ivhhn.org/ash-protection
  • 6 videos, pamphlets, leaflets and posters on protecting yourself from volcanic ash
  • Supplement of PAHO’s Bulletin, on the HIVE study, planned for late 2019.

Publications

Peer Reviewed Disaster Risk Reduction, Disease (Communicable & Non-communicable)

Factors motivating the use of respiratory protection against volcanic ashfall: a comparative analysis of communities in Japan, Indonesia and Mexico

Peer Reviewed Disaster Risk Reduction, Disease (Communicable & Non-communicable)

Health Interventions in Volcanic Eruptions – Community Wearability Assessment of Respiratory Protection against Volcanic Ash from Mt Sinabung, Indonesia

Peer Reviewed Disease (Communicable & Non-communicable)

The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part I: Filtration efficiency tests

Peer Reviewed Disease (Communicable & Non-communicable)

The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part II: Total inward leakage tests

Manual Disaster Risk Reduction, Disease (Communicable & Non-communicable)

How to protect yourself from breathing volcanic ash

Latest Updates

Learn more about HIVE

Mar 2019

HIVE is a research consortium that aims to build a new, and urgently required, evidence base on the effectiveness and suitability of different forms of respiratory protection for general population use during volcanic crises.

View
2019Mar

Authority and volcanoes (Mexico)

Jul 2016

Volcanoes are sites in which tensions arise over what to do in case of disasters — the notion of what is a disaster can be conceived in so many different…

View
2016Jul

Introducting HIVE

Dec 2015

In November 2015 I attended a five-day workshop to launch the Health Intervention in Volcanic Eruptions (HIVE) project. My name is Ernesto Schwartz-Marin and my role in the project is…

View
2015Dec

Subscribe to our newsletters....

Subscribe
 
Elrha © 2018 - 2019 Elrha is a registered charity in England and Wales (1177110).
Elrha Please upgrade your browser

You are seeing this because you are using a browser that is not supported. The Elrha website is built using modern technology and standards. We recommend upgrading your browser with one of the following to properly view our website:

Windows Mac

Please note that this is not an exhaustive list of browsers. We also do not intend to recommend a particular manufacturer's browser over another's; only to suggest upgrading to a browser version that is compliant with current standards to give you the best and most secure browsing experience.