We're Listening: An Evaluation of User-Centred Community Engagement In Emergency Sanitation

P. Sandison
05
February
2019
Output type
Report
Location
No items found.
Focus areas
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)
Topics
User-centred design
QRCS staff and a community member discussing drainage problems during the ethnographic survey. Credit: Qatar Red Crescent Society, 2018

Community engagement in emergency sanitation is often limited and rarely monitored or evaluated, despite its perceived importance. Documented evidence of the effectiveness of rapid community engagement in emergencies is scarce. In 2017, the Humanitarian Innovation Fund launched a challenge to develop and test innovative community engagement approaches for emergency sanitation and to evaluate their effectiveness using a robust monitoring and evaluation methodology. Qatar Red Crescent Society, Save the Children and Welthungerhilfe implemented user-centred sanitation projects in Lebanon, Bangladesh, Iraq and Uganda, and the four projects were evaluated by Oxfam.

This report presents the findings, discusses the methods used and considers their effect on latrine design, satisfaction and ownership. The report identifies promising practices and points to evidence gaps which could be addressed in future community engagement responses. Also available to download: a note on the methodology of the evaluation.

Other resources

explore all resources
Final Report: The Rapid Provision of Appropriate Wheelchairs in Emergency Situations
Evaluation of the benefits and risks of introducing Ebola community care centers, Sierra Leone. Emerg Infect Dis
Delivering therapy over telephone in a humanitarian setting: a pilot randomized controlled trial of common elements treatment approach (CETA) with Syrian refugee children in Lebanon
Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH)
User-centred design
No items found.
No items found.
Oxfam GB