With humanitarian emergencies occurring at increasing rates and affecting a growing number of people, evidence-based strategies and new solutions – including in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) – are vital to ensure people have their essential needs met, can live in dignity and are protected from WASH-related diseases.
‘Gaps in WASH in Humanitarian Response: 2021 Update’ reveals the most pressing WASH challenges facing communities affected by crises worldwide.
This gap analysis is informed by the most comprehensive global WASH data collection of its kind, with more than 1,700 people affected by crisis sharing their views and experiences along with almost 700 in-country WASH practitioners. In addition to this, a survey was conducted with 246 global WASH practitioners and a review of 614 academic articles and grey literature publications was completed.
The gap analysis identifies the priority gaps in humanitarian WASH systems and responses that are limiting the sector’s potential to meet essential needs, minimise WASH-related disease, restore life with dignity to people experiencing emergencies and strengthen their resilience.
We hope it will help set priorities for future WASH research, innovation, coordination and delivery, prompting stakeholders to further explore and seek to understand the root causes of the major gaps experienced by people affected by crisis.
Collaborative effort is now required for WASH actors to better understand why these gaps exist and to explore where more attention and investment needs to be focused. Ultimately, we hope that the gap analysis will lead to the development of new evidence, solutions and approaches to ensure that the gaps are addressed.
The 2021 Gap Analysis package consists of four interlinked reports:
If you have any questions about the 2021 WASH Gap Analysis please get in touch with us via firstname.lastname@example.org.
The 2021 Gap Analysis was commissioned and funded by Elrha’s Humanitarian Innovation Fund, in collaboration with the GWC and delivered by Oxfam, Tufts University, Cranfield University and University of Leeds. Oxfam contributed additional in-kind match funding in the form of staff time. All partners, except Tufts University, actively contributed to the development of the methodology of the project. Tufts carried out an independent analysis of the data. Additionally, a Review Group supported the project by providing technical assistance. This work was made possible with funding and support from the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA).
You are seeing this because you are using a browser that is not supported. The Elrha website is built using modern technology and standards. We recommend upgrading your browser with one of the following to properly view our website:Windows
Please note that this is not an exhaustive list of browsers. We also do not intend to recommend a particular manufacturer's browser over another's; only to suggest upgrading to a browser version that is compliant with current standards to give you the best and most secure browsing experience.