Does the Humanitarian Sector Use Evidence-informed Standards? A Review of the 2011 Sphere Indicators for Wash, Food Security and Nutrition, and Health Action

S. Frison, J. Smith, K. Blanchet
30
October
2018
Output type
Journal article
Location
No items found.
Focus areas
No items found.
Topics
Evidence Review
Programme
Humanitarian Research
Organisations
No items found.

In 1997, the pursuit of greater accountability and effectiveness in humanitarian response prompted a multi-stakeholder collaboration to develop a set of indicators and standards to guide humanitarian practitioners, published later in the form of the Sphere Handbook. Twenty years after the first edition of the Handbook was developed, and in order to guide the 2018 revision, an assessment of the evidence base for current Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), Food Security and Nutrition, and Health Action indicators, as compared to evidence collated by the 2015 LSHTM Humanitarian Health Evidence Review (HHER), was conducted.

Of the 159 Sphere indicators intended to guide humanitarian response, only 2 met all of the SMART criteria. The remaining 157 did not provide any time indication for the measurement of the indicator. Furthermore, only 11 standards (23%) and 14 indicators (8%) are supported in part by 33 studies identified in the HHER. Less than one third of studies captured by HHER that explore interventions related to WASH, nutrition, or health could be linked to existing Sphere indicators.

Other resources

explore all resources
Long-term impacts of a cash plus program on marriage, fertility, and education after six years in pastoralist Kenya: A cluster randomized trial
Mobile technology: listening to the voice of Haitians
Mise en oeuvre des mesures de santé publique chez les personnes déplacées internes (PDIs) au cours de la pandémie de la COVID 19 en Afrique fracophone: le cas du Mali.
No items found.
Evidence Review
Global
No items found.
No items found.